Robin's Empire


No Blind Faith?
July 15, 2011, 11:28 am
Filed under: Uncategorized

While faith in Buddhism does not imply "blind faith", Buddhist faith (as advocated by the Buddha in various scriptures, or sutras) nevertheless requires a degree of faith and belief primarily in the spiritual attainment of the Buddha. 


Faith in Buddhism centers on the understanding that the Buddha is an Awakened being, on his superior role as teacher, in the truth of his Dharma (spiritual Doctrine), and in his Sangha (community of spiritually developed followers). 

Faith in Buddhism is better classified or defined as a Confidence in the Buddha, Dharma and Sangha, and is intended to lead to the goal of Awakening (bodhi) and Nirvana. 

Volitionally, faith implies a resolute and courageous act of will. It combines the steadfast resolution that one will do a thing with the self-confidence that one can do it.[7]

As a counter to any form of "blind faith", the Buddha taught the Kalama Sutra, exhorting his disciples to investigate any teaching and to live by what is learnt and accepted, rather than believing something outright.


May you be well, happy, peaceful.

With Gratitude,
ROBIN



「面對生死與善生善終」佛學講座
July 11, 2011, 2:57 pm
Filed under: Uncategorized

馬來西亞八打靈佛光文教中心 

「面對生死與善生善終」佛學講座

【人間社記者陳玉苗 馬來西亞八打靈報導】

http://life.fgs.org.tw/content/culture_art_news.php?ArticleNo=60889&news_class=SS02


圖說 1:「面對生死與善生善終」佛學講座,獲得逾200名信眾到場聆聽,陳醫生的分享令大家獲益不淺。


圖說 2:陳德威講師說,許多人看到天災人禍時,都會感覺別人很可憐,除了生起慈悲心外,大家更應該惜福自己還活著,可利用有限時間為他人作出貢獻,人生要活出有價值的生命,才能活得有意思。 人間社記者 張仁德
    
  馬來西亞八打靈佛光文教中心於621日邀請陳德威講師主講「面對生死與善生善終」,逾200名信眾到場聆聽。陳德威講師是律師,亦是一名藥劑師,簽過無數死亡證書,
他覺得華人最怕談死,但不管你有沒有準備好,隨時都要面對死亡。

  人其實是很脆弱的,不管你是馬拉松健將、或世上最強的人總是怕死甚至是有錢的人都要死,因財富並不能幫助我們,許多人看醫生也好比六道輪迴一樣,從新加坡看到中國,再到美國又到大馬,其實現在醫學昌明到那裡都一樣。因此,也是從事臨終關懷的陳德威講師表示,人在還清醒時,最好能立下遺囑及授權書,讓別人知道你的意願,
醫生才會知道你的選擇。

  另外,要以什麼儀式來處理也應該寫清楚,火化是最環保的方法。許多人看到天災人禍時,都會感覺別人很可憐,除了生起慈悲心外,大家更應該惜福自己還活著,可利用有限時間為他人作出貢獻,人生要活出有價值的生命,才能活得有意思。

佛光文教中心举办 佛学讲座来源:星洲日报 点击: 6

主办:佛光文教中心
日期:21/06/2011
地点:八打灵再也佛光文教中心
时间:晚上8
主题:面对生死与善终善生
主讲:陈德威医生
详情:陈德威医生是一位新加坡注册的药剂师,曾获美国旧金山金门大学工商管理硕士学位,他也是亚洲首
个获得美国应用研究伦理协会认证的内部专业人员。
生死学专家表示,人生的三大事莫过于生得健康、活得快乐和一定要好死。懂得死亡,我们才懂得如何
生活。一个人临终前也要保有尊严,让他舒适和没有痛苦地走完人生的最后旅程。
备注:佛光文教中心诚邀大家一起前来共沾法益
入场:免费
洽询:03-7877 6533
地址:No 2 Jln SS3/33 Taman University 46300 PJ.



如何面對生和死
June 23, 2011, 3:26 pm
Filed under: Buddhism, Death, for Buddhist


新加坡醫學講座-如何面對生和死


100/06/21
http://www.fgs.org.tw:81/gate/gb/life.fgs.org.tw/content/culture_art_news.php?ArticleNo=60422&news_class=SS06


http://www.fgs.org.tw/news/news_content.aspx?news_no=20110621000024


【人間社記者辜天財 新加坡報導】談死向來是華人的禁忌。但是死亡?是必須面對的結局,因此所有人都應該學習如何面對死亡。理想的人生境界莫過於生得健康、活得快樂及死得安詳。
  
6
18日晚上,新加坡佛光山邀請新加坡國立大學臨床研究中心醫學倫理委員會(NUS Institutional Review BoardIRB)高級經理陳德威藥劑師來到現場,大家來場別開生面的死亡探討和對話;有佛光會新加坡協會溫會長及西區分會劉主彬、南區分會林玉蘭會長等逾300人聆聽。
  
陳藥劑師指出無論是慢性病或老年、癌症抑或是猝死,善終的定義或是俗話說的「好死」應該是有充分準備的死亡。但是沒有人知道死亡何時何地會出現。因此平時,無論是自己還是身邊的人都要積極學習擁抱活著、臨終和死後的智慧及慈悲。
  
他向聽眾指出善終有好些原則是應該遵守的;比如說獲得宗教的精神支援從而瞭解及接受死亡,平復恐懼的情緒,可以選擇死亡的地點又或是獲得專家的意見,周圍的人也應儘量維護臨終者的尊嚴;最後臨終者可以自己?定如何渡過生命最後的旅程,甚至留下預先醫療指示,決定是否在無可挽留的彌留之際繼續接受醫療拯救,這樣就可以減少痛苦及負擔。
  
也是一名律師的陳德威也舉例一些牽涉到法律的死亡前後所面對的問題,老一輩的人都不喜歡先立下遺囑(Last Will),認為不吉利。殊不知在倉促離世後,留給家庭法律煩惱甚至引起家族糾紛。因此,他鼓勵上了年紀的人士甚至是年輕人,應破除不必要的禁忌趕快立下遺囑,以保衛家人的安寧。陳德威律師的主講詼諧有趣、深入淺出,一場本來嚴肅及沉重的話題變得輕鬆及容易被聽眾接受,現場提問的觀點非常踴躍。陳德威律師也趁機向大家介紹另一種類似遺囑的持久授權書(Lasting Power of Attorney),它是當事人自願委任一名人士在自己失去決定的心智慧力時,代替當事人處理個人福利和財務的法律文件;在彌留或是昏迷時,遺囑還派不上有場,這時持久授權書就可以解?很多麻煩,比如動用當事人的財務來進行治療。
  
陳德威律師還提到臨終病人的心理變化,從一開始的否認到變得憤怒,怨恨到什麼是自己而不是別人,這時周圍的人應該給與支援及諒解。過後是來到磋商期,希望可以等到某某事達成後才放心離世。不過死亡豈會等待?最後希望破滅後臨終病人變得非常沮喪逐漸失去生存意志。接著病人明白死亡無可避免,會開始想要好好規劃身後事,接受事實。

在面對臨終病人時,交流是個關鍵,病人和照顧者可以互相瞭解彼此的需要和想法,患者必須學會放下,以便能安詳地離開。最後,陳德威律師強調人生最後甚至是當下最重要的四句話;第一句:請原諒我、第二句:我原諒你。寬恕別人也寬恕自己。第三句是謝謝。要有感恩的心。最後一句話就是,我愛你,再見!

陳德威律師的母親也來到現場幫兒子打氣給與支援。短短一小時半的死亡課題,主講及分享就在聽眾意猶未盡之下結束了;出席者都學習到了一些臨終及死亡的知識及態度,這個週末晚上真的獲益匪淺。

圖說:陳德威藥劑師指出無論是慢性病或老年、癌症抑或是猝死,善終的定義或是俗話說的好死應該是有充分準備的死亡。 人間社記者 鄭萬聯



May you be well, happy, peaceful.

With Gratitude,
ROBIN



A Buddhist’s view on SIN-gapore Election
May 6, 2011, 11:43 am
Filed under: Uncategorized

Like the author below, I am never a “politically” inclined person. After all, being a Singaporean, most of the elections were walkover with no opposition contesting my area or GRC, and election day was just one more extra holiday in every 4 years.

As Buddhist, I also understand that all these are impermanent.

Most Politicians think they can rule the world, but only some of them did. Election period and the months building up for elections, are the “goody” weeks where the reigning “Gods” descend from the god realm and throne of governance, and start to offer the hungry ghosts and human on earth some extra money or sudden pay-out from the hell bank. Such Gods also start to become humble and start to descend to the human and hungry ghost realm to preach how good they are, so that they can gain the same power to control them for the next five years.

Singapore ruling party will face their biggest challenges since independence in this coming election. By tomorrow & May 2011, Singapore Citizen will cast their votes. Except the few who dare to make a difference, I believe the majority will take the “Dun rock the boat” or “kia-si” mentality to vote the ruling PArty. And there is nothing wrong with that, since Singapore has been the most prosperous and progressing country since the step down of our mentors.

This time, however, a new group of voters have entered the scene. Being the society of endless complaints, the younger Generation Y for Why and Generation W for “Whatever”, will make their voice heard. And I am sure the proud Gods will fall to the lower opposing Asura realm, whilst the Asura will exert their jealousy more in the campaign and manifesto, as a form of dream yoga.

This is a time where the proud Gods must repent for all the past mistakes and openly admit and accept the criticisms. Whether it is an escape of a hell being due to lack of control, a over-spillage of public funds to create an international disgrace at the run of the Gods, or a wrong investment of hard earned tax-payer money on some hell papers or a casino to help the greed hatred and ignorance, the proud Gods remain un-regrettable and not sorry nor apologizing. Perhaps, they should learn from the Buddhist repentance prayer. They should acknowledge the mistakes, make good and amend of whatever wrong they have created, double their compassion practice and use their wisdom to prevent the re-occurrence of such unfortunate mistakes. Instead, we see the Gods being defensive, aggressive, tit-for-tat, struggle to fight their opponent or even try to dig up the revealer mistakes and argue their way through.

Self reflection is important for all sentient beings.

Buddhists believe in Karma, and that karma will run out one day. Like a pen that runs out of ink, Gods’ karma will run out too, and they too will have to enter into another lower realms of samsara. But like all sentient being who have not reach enlightenments, our Gods choose to continue to err and let their karma run out and facilitate their own descend. Hope their next realm is not the hell realm, like the Taiwanese or Korean fallen ex-presidents.

They never listen and they never had, perhaps they may listen now.

————————————————————————————

My take on the Singapore General Elections.

by Daphne on April 29, 2011

I’ve been mulling a long time over whether or not to do a post on the General Elections seeing how politics is such a contentious issue and this is after all a happy family blog.

The truth is, I’ve never been this interested in local politics in all my 28 years and this political awakening (if you can call it that) is a big deal for me. Not that I don’t like politics as a whole because I spent days camped out in front of the TV watching CNN during the last few American Presidential elections and my entire Final Year Thesis was on the topic of American politics. I’ve just never been interested in local politics because it seemed like such a lost cause to me. It was always just a bunch of disgruntled old men yelling at other less disgruntled old men – something I had very little interest or time for.

This time though, I’m excited because not only do we finally have a chance to vote (instead of being told we have no options), we’re also seeing young voters being interested in the voting process. I’ve been reading so many political opinions of late that it didn’t seem right to just sit this one out.

For starters, here’s what I’d really like to see in government.

1. I want a government that knows how to man up and say “I’m sorry” when they’ve made a mistake. For example, a mistake on the scale of busting the YOG budget by 3 times needs to be addressed with a decent amount of compunction rather than dismissiveness. With this current crop of PAP leaders, sorry really does seem to be the hardest word. Hey here’s a thought, people are more forgiving when you take responsibility and say “I’m sorry, I messed up big time.” You see, only after I hear the apology, I’ll be ready to hear about all the wonderful things you’ve done in your 5 years in office, not the other way around.

2. I want a government that really listens. The only defense that the PAP constantly falls back on these days is “I know better so just sit down and shut up.” Even if you genuinely believe that your Cambridge degrees and life of entitlement makes you better and smarter than everyone else, it would still do you a lot of good to listen to the struggles of your people. And by listening, I don’t mean walking around a week before election wearing flowers and doing your presidential wave.

3. I want a government that’s accountable. Ok, that’s my beef with a one-party system right there, a complete lack of checks and balances. It may have worked 57 years ago when you were ruling a country who didn’t know any better but we do know better now and one of the pitfalls of such a system is beginning to manifest itself in the form of disconnected, arrogant leaders who assume they have a right to lead just because they have kissed enough bottoms and made the right political connections. Connections like um say, marrying the private secretary of the Prime Minister.

4. I want a government that rises above the need to resort to threats in order to get votes. It’s insulting that you think our votes can be bought by shiny new lifts and a fresh coat of paint. If the price to pay for upgrading is my integrity and sense of justice, I’d much rather walk up that extra flight of steps and carry both my kids to run in the rain, thankyouverymuch. Also, what about your supporters living in these opposition constituencies? It’s a tad mercenary that you would sacrifice them as collateral damage just to prove a point, isn’t it?

5. I want a government that understands the value of humility and servitude. Often, it’s not just what you do but the manner in which you do it that counts. It bugs me that our Ministers talk down to the very people they are supposed to serve just because they don’t share the same opinions. You don’t get to be all high and mighty and demand that Singaporeans kiss the very ground you tread on. After all, we were the ones who put you in office and we will take you out if you alienate enough voters.

To all the people who think that voting the PAP means voting for stability, my only question is this, stability for who? If I were an incompetent Minster drawing $1.4 million of taxpayer’s money annually, I’d be yelling about stability too. I mean, it’d be mighty unstable for me if I had to one day *gasp*, take a ride on a crowded train like all my minions. And then I’d actually have to walk from point to point because where will I ever find the money to have people carry me around on their shoulders while I wear this ridiculous garland around my neck. I can’t be certain but even if Desmond Choo did momentarily lose the use of both his legs, there’s a whole range of fancy motorized wheelchairs that can serve as perfectly good modes of transportation. There’s really no need to rely on a human sedan these days. Last time I checked, you guys were supposed to BE public servants, not HAVE a lot of public servants.

Now lest you think that I’m dissing all the good work our government has done in years gone by, I’m not. I have a lot of respect for MM Lee, SM Goh, PM Lee (Jr) and a select handful of Ministers. I’ll be the first to say that I’m terribly proud of how far Singapore has come with all that was going against us so props to y’all. On my recent flight back from Florida, I was seated next to an elderly American gentleman who was thrilled to be sitting next to a “tiny Asian girl who didn’t take up too much arm room” (exact words, I promise) and decided to reward my lack of size with a spirited discourse about our Minister Mentor’s awesomeness the moment he heard that I was from Singapore. He went on and on about MM Lee’s political acumen, sharp thinking and fabulous policy-making skills. I have to admit that it was nice to know how much respect people all over the world have for one of us. Finally, he asked me “so what do you think of him?” To which I replied, “I agree with everything that you’ve said and even though we sometimes don’t like him very much, he is the single most respected man in all of Singapore.”

That said, I just have a teensy weensy problem with the argument that just because they’ve had a proven track record, we should blindly cast our vote for all the subsequent leaders that they pick out for the sake of stability. First of all, we all know that past successes don’t necessarily guarantee future success. Second, for all their success in ruling the nation with a tight fist, the leaders in PAP don’t seem to be particularly adept at picking the next generation of leaders. If you’re saying that after scouring the entire list of under-30 Singaporeans and the best you can come up with is a Tin Pei Ling, that tells me all I need to know about your selection skills. I have nothing against Pei Ling as a person and I’m sure she’s every bit as saccharine sweet as her photos suggest but I have a lot against her ability to serve the needs of the people. Underneath the hollow-sounding rhetoric she dishes out, I see no substance or even real desire to better the needs of Singaporeans. It seems to me that the only criteria to be selected as a future leader in the PAP is to be able to memorize and regurgitate the party’s rhetoric (that is starting to sound as empty as a big fat black hole of emptiness).

I’m also not surprised by the popularity of her direct opposition candidate, Nicole Seah. After hearing her various speeches and interviews, I am suitably impressed. Yes, I get that she’s even younger, has no track record or experience, gets a little nervy during some of her speeches and is probably this popular only because of the seeming incompetence of Tin Pei Ling. All fair criticisms, but if if I could vote in that constituency, she would still definitely have my vote for the very fundamental reason that she’s got heart – something that’s sorely missing in our incumbent party. I respect the fact that with all her inexperience and practically zero chance of drawing a $13,000 monthly salary, she was willing to offer her candidacy simply because she wanted to make a change for the benefit of the people. Her agenda is not a fat paycheck but to put right the things that have gone so very wrong in our government. I’d go as far as to say that even if she made it into parliament and doesn’t accomplish all the things she set out to, that’s ok because damnit, she tried.

I’m growing tired of hearing the PAP say that change can only come from within. After 57 years as the ruling party, the most notable change I see is in relation to how their paychecks are getting larger. The only way to show that Ministers don’t have to draw an obscene salary from taxpayer’s money is to have brilliant Ministers who are not in it for the money and yet no less committed or capable than those who demand to have their coffers padded.

This is definitely going to be a watershed election and I’m proud to have candidates like Sylvia Lim (in my opinion, the best public speaker in the local politics scene), Low Thia Khiang and Chen Show Mao offering their services to the nation. For the first time, I feel like there’s a chance we as the people have the power to effect change. Instead of sitting around and complaining that things aren’t right and we can’t do anything about it, we see candidates who are willing to step up to the plate to make a difference. And more importantly, we see voters (especially younger ones) who aren’t ignorant or apathetic.

On this note, I’d like to point out that identifying certain glaring faults in the incumbent party does not make one anti-PAP or pro-opposition. Voters are a lot more discerning these days and just because they question some facets of your leadership does not make them the enemy. The bottom line is that I vote for progress and if that comes in the form of non-PAP politicians, that gets my vote. And I can honestly say that if the PAP can indeed bring change from within and address all the issues that have been raised, I’d be happy to be called pro-PAP.

For now though, there are several PAP candidates that don’t deserve a seat in parliament. A lot has been said about the GRC system and for all its merits, it doesn’t seem right that mediocrity is rewarded just because the right alliances are made. To be more precise, it would be a great disservice to Singaporeans if Tin Pei Ling gets a parliamentary seat and Sylvia Lim doesn’t.

In any case, this election is going to be more exciting than an episode of 24.

PS. Also, PAP, just cut it out with the comrades thing. The only people I know who went around calling everyone comrades were perpetrators of genocide. Seriously, just stop it.

{ 58 comments… read them below or add one }




84000 ways to reach enlightenment
May 4, 2011, 11:59 am
Filed under: Uncategorized


We have the same teacher.. the Guatama Buddha – Shakyamuni.


It is said that the Buddha offered 84,000 teachings during the years after his awakening. He offered 84,000 ways for students to move toward enlightenment.

It wasn’t that the Buddha created 84,000 lesson plans from which to learn, but rather, it is symbolic of the fact that the Buddha acknowledged there are as many ways to move toward happiness,
goodness, love and peace (enlightenment) as there are people trying to move in that direction.

All the teachings is from the same Buddha..

And even when it is not from the Buddha, you can also learn about other religions and practice them if you prefer or like. You will also reach enlightenment.. just that you will not reach it via the Buddhist way.

For example, a good friend who is a Muslim by birth asked if he can also take refuge and learn from the Buddha, his Dharma and the Sangha too. And of course he can, and he need not give up his practice for Buddhism at all. Buddhism does not need conversation, as practicing wisdom and compassion is in all religions too.

To me, it is not just two directional views, but 84000 views.

Karma does play a part on how you look at things. If you don’t have the karma to see an enlightenment being, it does not mean that such beings does not exist. Just like if you haven’t seen God, can you dare conclude that God does not exist?

The best teaching is to respect all the 84000 views and ways, rather than to jump at it and say it is wrong. Once you start to criticize, because of your own lack of karma to understand or your own lack of knowledge and wisdom or exposure, then you are like a frog in a well thinking that the whole world is just your well and not that there is a bigger world outside.

Once you think you know everything, your learning of wisdom have ended. And when you think you know nothing, your wisdom is developing.


Remember, a full cup can never hold anymore fresh incoming water.



May you be well, happy, peaceful.

With Gratitude,
ROBIN



Buddhism and Buddhist Policeman
April 8, 2011, 11:01 am
Filed under: Uncategorized

Buddhism is so wonderful, it is a lesson for all of us to remind ourselves as a self restraint and self practice… and yet it should never be used as a corrective comment to point out the mistake of others, unless the person is your student or under your linage of care.
As I have always said, whenever you see others’ practice different from yours, observe and keep quiet. Do not add a commentary, and do not “advise” OR CRITICIZE, because there are 84000 ways and no one should be A Buddhist Policeman, patrolling at “wrong practice”.

People may be insulted and may challenge back your practice and your teachers’ practice.

My teaching comes from my various teachers, and tested out by them and subsequently myself personally, before I even dare to teach my students. Of course, I can teach, but how much the student can learn depend of his own karma. Many a times, a teacher can repeat the teaching a hundred times, and the students still make the same mistake. Is it because he is a bad teacher or is it the students own karma?
同桌吃饭,各自修行。


May you be well, happy, peaceful.

With Gratitude,
ROBIN



Life Liberation – A Profitable Buddhist Business?
March 9, 2011, 11:07 am
Filed under: Uncategorized




‘Release of life’ religious practice spurs big business: group

Central News Agency, Taiwan News 2 Oct 09;

Taipei, Oct. 2 (CNA) In Taiwan, religious groups spend more than NT$200 million (US$6.19 million) annually to engage in “release of life” rituals, which they practice 750 times on average each year, according to the Environment and Animal Society of Taiwan (EAST) Friday.

People usually practice “fangsheng, ” or “release of life, ” when they fall ill, have a miserable marriage or want to pray for wealth in their next life, the EAST said in a statement on a recent survey on the practice in Taiwan.

Some Buddhism followers believe that setting animals free increases their own merit, which translates into a better rebirth.

This has sparked a new profit-making business in the religious market in Taiwan, the EAST said.

The business is supported by a complete demand and supply system that operates on the “symbiosis” between religious believers and hunters, breeders and vendors, it added. However, this business not only hurts the animals that are hunted or bred for sale to fangsheng adherents, but also causes damage to the ecological system, it added.

In the 2009 survey, EAST interviewed operators and staff of 484 local Buddhist and Taoist temples and other groups that follow the teachings of esoteric Buddhism.

It found that 256 of the 388 respondent groups maintain the fangsheng practice, while 98 have given it up, and 34 have not practiced it in a long time and are not sure whether they will do so again.

Seven of the groups that still practice fangsheng said they do so in foreign countries, including China, Hong Kong, the United States, Canada, Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Nepal and India.

Notably, an organization run by a Buddhist monk named Hai Tao was found to have engaged in a total of 89 instances of fangsheng in Taiwan and 35 abroad in 2008, according to the survey. This year, it has so far engaged in ritual freeing of animals 75 times in Taiwan and 22 times overseas, the survey found.

On average, it organized 10 rounds of activities a month for its members to free animals, the EAST said, describing the Hai Tao group as a”super fangsheng organization.” Based on the survey, the EAST estimated that more than 200 million creatures are used in Taiwan each year in the religious ritual and at least NT$200 million is spent annually on such activities.

Birds, fish, frogs, turtles and snakes are the most commonly used animals, according to the survey.

Turtledoves, sparrows, scaly-breasted munia, and Japanese white-eye are the most popular birds in the “release of life” activities because they are cheap and can be easily caught in large numbers in the wild in Taiwan, the EAST said.

It noted that the birds are often kept in tiny wooden cages before being transferred to bird shops and that some of them usually die from shock in captivity.

(By Elizabeth Hsu)

Groups release 200 mil. animals annually: study
China Post 3 Oct 09;

TAIPEI, Taiwan — According to a recent study conducted by the Environment and Animal Society of Taiwan, Taiwan’s religious groups performed practices to release animals up to 750 times annually, or 2.1 times daily.

The statistics show a significant amount of the animals are being released into an ecological environment different from their origins.

In a press release, the animal society released the findings of their 2009 study on Taiwan’s free-the-animal practices. Spots for freeing fishes include several popular tourist sites such as Tamshi Fisher’s Wharf or Sun Moon Lake. For freeing birds, common sites were Yangmingshan National Park or Yushan National Park.

The director of the society, Chen Yu-min stated that Taiwanese conduct these practices in rivers, reservoirs, and mountains. Furthermore some have taken the ritual internationally such as China, Hong Kong, United States, Canada, Indonesia, or Malaysia.

The top animal choices for freeing include the sparrow and Lonchura Punctulata (black-colored bead), due to their cheaper price. Although the White-Rumped Shama is also among the top picks, it creates a danger to Taiwan ecological environment since it originates outside of the country.

The study found there were a total or 256 groups conducting free-the-animal ceremonies, one third less than 2004. Regardless, 32 of the groups practice it monthly. The study estimated the cost of the rituals to be at least NT$200 million a year with over 200 million animals being freed annually.



May you be well, happy, peaceful.

With Gratitude,
ROBIN



No Choice
February 15, 2011, 10:11 am
Filed under: Uncategorized


Quite often, I hear people mentioned the word “No Choice” as if he is resigned to fate, circumstantial limitations and something that they cannot get out.

When asked further, to these people, it is like “the fishes must be in the water” ; “that birds must learn to fly” ; “that termites will have to eat up all the books”… No Choice, that’s life.
I took a different look recently on my life and the things that I can do. Actually, if we think carefully, we have a lot of choices. But we shut ourselves and resign to fate.
The whole medical profession is about choices, the type of food you eat is about choices, and the way you lead your life and your next action is about choices too. Then when it is “No Choice’?
It comes back to our GHI;
Greed and desire already limits our choice, we want the best but lose out on all the second best or better; Hatred completely close our minds and stop any incoming of new information where we can make better decision with a means to an end; and
Ignorance sums up all our stupidity and laziness to move forward.
Someone told me that this is intrinsic in Buddhism, the belief in Karma, the lost of action (as we are always sitting and meditating), and our belief of rebirth. But this is not the correct understanding (8NP).
The belief in Karma makes us do the right things right; meditation is not about just sitting down and watch your mind at a retreat centre – but it is a daily practice every minute in our mind to understand the true nature of our issues and how we can handle our suffering better; and rebirth is a choice, and we can control it through our understanding of the four noble truth (4NT) and our practice of the eightfold noble path (8NP).
So try it. You have choices, just because you choose to close your eyes, it doesn’t mean the choices are not there.

May you be well, happy, peaceful.

With Gratitude,
ROBIN



Is Buddhist animal liberation a merit collecting exercise?
January 27, 2011, 4:29 pm
Filed under: Uncategorized

The Pali canon identifies three bases of merit (Pali: puññakiriyavatthu). In the Puññakiriyavatthusuttaṃ ("Meritorious actions discourse," AN 8.36 or A 8.4.6),[1] the Buddha identifies these three bases:

In the "Sangiti Sutta" ("Chanting together discourse," DN 33), verse 38, Ven. Sariputta identifies the same triad:dāna, sīla, bhāvanā.[2]

In the Khuddaka Nikaya's Itivuttaka (Iti. 1.22),[3] the three bases are defined as: giving (dānassa), self mastery (damassa) and refraining (saññamassā).[4] Later in this same sutta, the triad is restated as: giving (dāna), a life of mental calm (sama-cariya)[5] and a mind of good-will (metta-citta).[3]

Is Buddhist animal liberation a merit collecting exercise?

Again it is important to practice right intention with the right effort.  If one's purpose of deliberately doing a good deed is to collect merits, the intention is wrong, and thus little merits are generated.   One such form is the Animal Liberation exercise that Buddhists got entangled into.

I have seen Buddhists buying farm cultured fishes and releasing them to the ocean or reservoir, only to be served as some other animals' dinner.  Worst still, after the animal liberation exercise, this same group of people will go to a restaurant for seafood where live fishes, prawn and crabs are immediately killed for their pleasure.
Buddhists should refrain from killing intentionally. Liberating animals for the sake of self merits is not a recommended practice as it may increase suffering to the animals.

Buddhists earn merit through mindfulnessmeditationchanting and other rituals.

A post-canonical commentary (Atthakatha) , elaborating on the canonically identified meritorious triad of dana-sila-bhavana (see D.III,218), states that lay devotees can make merit by performing these seven more specific acts:

  1. honoring others (apacayana-maya)
  2. offering service (veyyavacca-maya)
  3. involving others in good deeds (pattidana-maya)
  4. being thankful for others' good deeds (pattanumodana-maya)
  5. listening to Teachings (dhammassavana-maya)
  6. instructing others in the Teachings (dhammadesana-maya)
  7. straightening one's own views in accord with the Teachings (ditthujukamma)[6]
Merits is generated for pure action with no hidden agenda and definitely not an intentional stamp collecting exercise.  But there is no one size fits all answer and it is up to you to be mindful of your own actions.


May you be well, happy, peaceful.

With Gratitude,
ROBIN



Goodbye, Tiffany (Tiffy) as you cross the rainbow bridge this morning
January 12, 2011, 12:09 pm
Filed under: Uncategorized


Tiffany – in her own class

Originally uploaded by Robin3388

Tiffy came to our home as a little puppy from the pet shop. She was an imported pedigree American Cocker Spaniel and we had her when she was 8 months old.

As she was our first dog in the new house, we were afraid that she was lonely as a puppy and bought a cross Cocker Spaniel (we called him Gucci) to keep her company.

After having her for half a year, she was diagnosed with hereditary Juvenile Glaucoma and became blind in both eye at the age of 18 months old. Gucci then became her blind guide dog as she will follow Gucci whenever he goes.

Tiffy passed away and crossed the rainbow bridge this morning 12 Jan 2011 at 5.28am.

I gave her a warm bath after silent chanting for 1 hour and performed her last offices before sending her for cremation. She was cleaned and dried and rolled up in a new yellow towel with sandal wood. Chrysanthemum flowers were laid in a new colourful IKEA box for friends from the pet cremation service to collect her. Her ashes will be scattered to the sea.

(This is probably the same last office and funeral arrangement that I have arranged and planned for myself.)

Go well Tiffy, and be reborn as a Human in the next life..

OM MANI PADME HUM _/!\_




Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.